My Comprehension Process
It is hard
thinking back on my own comprehension process, but various events stuck out in
my mind while reading Tomkins and the two articles for this week’s reading. I
remember being a literalist like the Applegate article described. I had a
harder time thinking outside the box and “reading in between the lines;” if the
answer was not directly in the text I would get nervous. In the sixth grade I
was a part of the Book Bowl club. This was a very question-answer based club
for my team and I had to remember explicit details about ten books. Since I was
a literalist this really helped.
However, to
help develop my comprehension my teachers taught me very good visualization
techniques even from a young age. As the Gregory article states, even Kindergartners
can begin using strategies such as questioning and visualization or “making
movies.” This “making movies” strategy has helped me because it keeps me
focused on what I am reading. One pitfall I struggle with in comprehension is
drifting off. If I know I am not visualizing then I know I am simply reading
words on a page.
Thinking
back I did not have one specific teacher who stood out in teaching me
strategies and asking me higher ordered questions, but rather is was a
combination of all of them. With that being said I know my elementary education
could have been better at asking more of those higher ordered questions and
using more strategies. The comprehension discussed in these articles goes far
beyond the skills I learned in school, but I want to make sure my future
students are learning these strategies and continuously make connections and
dig deeper.
Classroom
I have noticed a lot of the behaviors in
regards to comprehension in my placement classroom that I read the readings. A
few weeks ago students read to me their “Backpack Reader” stories and I
determined if they were able to read the story well enough to start reading a
book that is a little harder. While there are many benefits to this program I
also see weaknesses. Most importantly is that I did not have to assess whether or
not they were comprehending the text. Therefore, I took it upon myself to ask
my own questions to make sure they were. While these were not higher order
thinking questions it was still a start.
The first
behavior I noticed was that if a student was not fluent at reading a book they
had a harder time answering my questions. Tomkins discusses how fluency is a
huge factor in comprehension. Another behavior I noticed was their motivation.
If students did not want to be reading to me they were simply getting the words
out as fast as they could so they could be done. Lastly, I witnessed what Tompkins
calls repairing. When I read with a particular child she read the sentence, but
knowing that it didn't make sense she went back and corrected the word.
Both
Gregory and Tompkins discuss how comprehension should be active and visible. Children
should connect to their own experiences and make meaning out of their reading. I
see in the classroom how when given the opportunity they love talking about
their text to self connections. They are truly story tellers. I think the
teacher should do more in catering to this excitement. While I do see
predicting and question and answer (literal questions) I do not see very much
questioning, text-to-world, text-to-text.